We’ve all seen it: a credit repair company proudly posts, “Look at the results I got for my client!” showcasing impressive credit score improvements. But there’s a catch—they’re almost always VantageScores.

This raises an important question: Is showing improvement in VantageScores a deceptive misrepresentation of actual credit improvement? Can these scores really reflect a consumer’s readiness to participate in the credit market, or are they just a marketing gimmick?

In the world of credit repair, transparency and accuracy are crucial, not just for consumers, but also for the professionals offering these services.

Recently, a significant debate arose within the credit repair community over the use of VantageScores in marketing, specifically whether showing a substantial increase in a consumer’s VantageScore is a fair representation of that consumer’s credit improvement and readiness for the credit market.

Let’s dive into the debate and analyze whether these claims hold water or if they’re simply too good to be true.

The Scenario: A Heated Debate Over Credit Scores

A credit repair company recently posted evidence of a successful intervention, showcasing an increase of over 100 points in a consumer’s VantageScore. The post was intended to highlight the effectiveness of the company’s methods. However, this claim sparked a heated debate.

Critics argued that representing a VantageScore increase as indicative of credit improvement was misleading. They asserted that VantageScores are not typically used by lenders for significant credit decisions, such as mortgages or auto loans, and are, therefore, irrelevant.

According to this view, showcasing VantageScore improvements gives consumers a false sense of readiness for the credit market, potentially leading them to believe they are better positioned to secure loans than they actually are.

One side of the argument claimed that this practice was akin to “snake oil salesmanship,” suggesting that consumers might be misled into thinking they are more creditworthy than they truly are, especially when their FICO scores—the scores more commonly used by lenders—might not reflect the same improvement.

The Counterpoint: VantageScore Increases Are Meaningful

On the other side of the debate, it was argued that while VantageScores and FICO scores are different, they are not so different as to render VantageScores meaningless.

In fact, both scoring models assess similar factors—such as payment history, credit utilization, and length of credit history—and improvements in these areas typically reflect positively across both models.

Images and Updates

I’ve reached out to the author of the post and asked for as much information as possible (mortgage scores, vantages scores, etc.). Here’s what I have so far and I’ve asked for updates as they progress (and I will update this post when that happens).

What the Data Says: Insights from the CFPB Study

It’s essential to examine the data to better understand this debate. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) conducted a study examining the differences between FICO and VantageScores.

Here are the key findings:

1. Strong Correlation Between Scores: The CFPB study found a correlation coefficient of approximately 0.90 between VantageScores and FICO scores. This high correlation indicates that when one score improves, the other generally follows suit, although the exact point increase might differ.

2. Super crazy wonky stuff that you can skip if you want:

• To understand what this correlation means, consider the coefficient of determination, which is the square of the correlation coefficient.
• For a correlation of 0.90, the coefficient of determination (r²) is 0.81. This means that 81% of the variability in FICO scores can be explained by changes in VantageScores.
• While this doesn’t mean the scores are identical, it does mean they tend to move in the same direction.
• For instance, if a consumer’s VantageScore increases by 100 points, the corresponding FICO score might increase by around 81 points, though this is a rough estimate.

3. Score Differences Are Different and Related: The study also found that while most consumers have similar FICO and VantageScores, around 20% could see a difference of 50 points or more between the two. This highlights that while the scores are related, they are not interchangeable. However, this does not diminish the fact that a significant improvement in VantageScore is likely to correspond with a meaningful improvement in FICO scores.

Practical Implications: What This Means for Credit Repair Companies and Consumers

The CFPB study suggests that while VantageScores and FICO scores are not identical, improvements in one score typically indicate improvements in the other. This has practical implications for both credit repair companies and consumers:

For Credit Repair Companies:

• When marketing credit repair services, it’s important to emphasize transparency. If a company showcases a significant VantageScore increase, it should also explain that while this is a positive indicator of credit improvement, the exact impact on FICO scores can vary.
• This approach not only fosters trust with clients but also ensures that consumers have realistic expectations about how their credit improvements will translate into real-world outcomes, such as loan approvals.

For Consumers:

• Understanding the differences between VantageScores and FICO scores is crucial. While an increase in VantageScore is generally a good sign, it’s important to remember that lenders may use a different score when making credit decisions.
• Consumers should view score improvements as part of a broader effort to improve their overall credit profile, focusing on factors like timely payments, reducing credit utilization, and maintaining a healthy credit history.

Conclusion: A Balanced View of Credit Scores

The debate over VantageScores and FICO scores underscores the complexity of credit scoring and the importance of transparency in credit repair marketing.

Both consumers and credit repair professionals should be aware that while VantageScores and FICO scores are closely related, they are not identical.

A significant increase in VantageScore is a positive sign, but it should be communicated as part of a broader picture of credit health, rather than as a standalone guarantee of credit readiness.

By maintaining transparency and providing clear explanations, credit repair companies can help their clients navigate the complex world of credit with confidence, while consumers can approach their credit improvement journey with a better understanding of how their efforts might translate into real-world credit outcomes.

Robert Sigman

See Full Bio